Drilling & Production Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 70-82.DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2024.02.09
• Ultra-deep Formation Drilling Technology • Previous Articles Next Articles
TAN Bin1(), ZHANG Bin2, TAO Huaizhi2
Revised:
2024-03-06
Online:
2024-03-25
Published:
2024-03-25
作者简介:
谭宾(1969-),正高级工程师,本刊编委副主任、主编,毕业于西南石油大学钻井工程专业,现任中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司总经理,从事石油天然气钻完井工程技术工作。地址:(610051)四川省成都市成华区建设北路一段6号,E-mail:tanb_sc@cnpc.com.cn
基金资助:
TAN Bin, ZHANG Bin, TAO Huaizhi. Current Situation and Development of Deep Exploration Key Drilling Technology[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2024, 47(2): 70-82.
谭宾, 张斌, 陶怀志. 深地勘探钻井技术现状及发展思考[J]. 钻采工艺, 2024, 47(2): 70-82.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zcgyzz.com/EN/10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2024.02.09
序号 | 井名 | 垂深/m | 完钻时间/年 | 国家/地区 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 巴登1井 | 9 159 | 1972 | 美国 | 直井 |
2 | 罗杰斯1井 | 9 583 | 1974 | 美国 | 直井 |
3 | Cerf Ranch井 | 9 043 | 1983 | 美国 | 直井 |
4 | 萨阿特雷CR-1井 | 9 000 | 1983 | 前苏联 | 直井 |
5 | Zistersdorf UT2A井 | 8 553 | 1983 | 奥地利 | 直井 |
6 | Norsk hydro科探井 | 9 723 | 1994 | 挪威 | 直井 |
7 | KTB计划井 | 9 101 | 1994 | 德国 | 直井 |
8 | Knotty Head井 | 9 754 | 2006 | 美国 | 直井 |
9 | Kaskida井 | 10 059(水深1 798) | 2006 | 美国 | 直井 |
10 | 泰博(Tiber)探井 | 10 685(水深1 259) | 2009 | 美国 | 直井 |
11 | 科拉SG-3井 | 12 262 | 1993 | 前苏联 | 直井 |
序号 | 井名 | 垂深/m | 完钻时间/年 | 国家/地区 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 巴登1井 | 9 159 | 1972 | 美国 | 直井 |
2 | 罗杰斯1井 | 9 583 | 1974 | 美国 | 直井 |
3 | Cerf Ranch井 | 9 043 | 1983 | 美国 | 直井 |
4 | 萨阿特雷CR-1井 | 9 000 | 1983 | 前苏联 | 直井 |
5 | Zistersdorf UT2A井 | 8 553 | 1983 | 奥地利 | 直井 |
6 | Norsk hydro科探井 | 9 723 | 1994 | 挪威 | 直井 |
7 | KTB计划井 | 9 101 | 1994 | 德国 | 直井 |
8 | Knotty Head井 | 9 754 | 2006 | 美国 | 直井 |
9 | Kaskida井 | 10 059(水深1 798) | 2006 | 美国 | 直井 |
10 | 泰博(Tiber)探井 | 10 685(水深1 259) | 2009 | 美国 | 直井 |
11 | 科拉SG-3井 | 12 262 | 1993 | 前苏联 | 直井 |
事故类型 | 数量/次 | 事故原因 |
---|---|---|
接头螺纹断裂 | 6 | 疲劳裂纹 |
接头断裂 | 3 | 钢材质量 |
管体断裂 | 12 | 拉伸负荷超过屈服极限 |
管子螺纹断裂 | 4 | 疲劳裂纹 |
接头螺纹滑扣 | 2 | 螺纹磨损 |
事故类型 | 数量/次 | 事故原因 |
---|---|---|
接头螺纹断裂 | 6 | 疲劳裂纹 |
接头断裂 | 3 | 钢材质量 |
管体断裂 | 12 | 拉伸负荷超过屈服极限 |
管子螺纹断裂 | 4 | 疲劳裂纹 |
接头螺纹滑扣 | 2 | 螺纹磨损 |
序号 | 井名 | 井型 | 井深(垂深)/m | 完钻时间 | 地区 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TK1井 | 直井 | 10 000(未完钻) | 正钻未完 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
2 | PT6井 | 直井 | 9 026 | 2023年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石油 |
3 | GL3C井 | 水平井 | 9 396(8 057) | 2023年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
4 | SY001-H6井 | 水平井 | 9 010(7 635) | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石油 |
5 | LT1井 | 直井 | 8 882 | 2019年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
6 | MS3井 | 直井 | 8 010 | 2021年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
7 | TS5井 | 直井 | 9 017 | 2021年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石化 |
8 | YS1井 | 直井 | 8 866 | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石化 |
9 | RT1井 | 直井 | 8 445 | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石化 |
序号 | 井名 | 井型 | 井深(垂深)/m | 完钻时间 | 地区 | 备注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TK1井 | 直井 | 10 000(未完钻) | 正钻未完 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
2 | PT6井 | 直井 | 9 026 | 2023年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石油 |
3 | GL3C井 | 水平井 | 9 396(8 057) | 2023年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
4 | SY001-H6井 | 水平井 | 9 010(7 635) | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石油 |
5 | LT1井 | 直井 | 8 882 | 2019年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
6 | MS3井 | 直井 | 8 010 | 2021年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石油 |
7 | TS5井 | 直井 | 9 017 | 2021年 | 塔里木盆地 | 中国石化 |
8 | YS1井 | 直井 | 8 866 | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石化 |
9 | RT1井 | 直井 | 8 445 | 2022年 | 四川盆地 | 中国石化 |
开次 | 钻头尺寸/ mm | 套管尺寸/ mm | 套管壁厚/ mm | 套管钢级 | 下入深度/ m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 914.4 | — | 38.10 | X80 | 1 161 |
2 | 660.4 | 558.80 | 38.10 | X80/H90D | 1 524 |
25.4 | X80/H90D | 2 134 | |||
3 | 457.2 | 457.20 | 14.38 | Q125 | 3 658 |
4 | 419.1 | 406.40 | 16.98 | HCQ125 | 5 793 |
5 | 368.3 | 346.08 | 16.22 | HCQ125 | 7 774 |
6 | 311.2 | 301.63 | 15.28 | HCQ125 | 8 536 |
7 | 269.9 | 250.83 | 16.98 | HCQ125 | 9 146 |
8 | 215.9 | 193.68 | 15.41 | Q125 | 9 451 |
开次 | 钻头尺寸/ mm | 套管尺寸/ mm | 套管壁厚/ mm | 套管钢级 | 下入深度/ m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 914.4 | — | 38.10 | X80 | 1 161 |
2 | 660.4 | 558.80 | 38.10 | X80/H90D | 1 524 |
25.4 | X80/H90D | 2 134 | |||
3 | 457.2 | 457.20 | 14.38 | Q125 | 3 658 |
4 | 419.1 | 406.40 | 16.98 | HCQ125 | 5 793 |
5 | 368.3 | 346.08 | 16.22 | HCQ125 | 7 774 |
6 | 311.2 | 301.63 | 15.28 | HCQ125 | 8 536 |
7 | 269.9 | 250.83 | 16.98 | HCQ125 | 9 146 |
8 | 215.9 | 193.68 | 15.41 | Q125 | 9 451 |
公司 | 型号 | 额定耐温/ ℃ | 额定耐压/ MPa |
---|---|---|---|
Benchtree | — | 185 | 207 |
休斯敦 | TEL200 | 185/200 | 207 |
哈利伯顿 | Quasar200 | 200 | 172 |
中威联合 | HEL | 200 | 207 |
斯伦贝谢 | TelescopeICE | 200 | 207 |
公司 | 型号 | 额定耐温/ ℃ | 额定耐压/ MPa |
---|---|---|---|
Benchtree | — | 185 | 207 |
休斯敦 | TEL200 | 185/200 | 207 |
哈利伯顿 | Quasar200 | 200 | 172 |
中威联合 | HEL | 200 | 207 |
斯伦贝谢 | TelescopeICE | 200 | 207 |
国外公司 | 钻井液体系 | 抗温/℃ | 应用特点及现场实例 |
---|---|---|---|
MI-SWACO | RHADIANT | 260 | 稳定的非渐进凝胶结构,抗污染能力强 |
VERSADRIL | 260 | 塔里木高温区块成功应用 | |
VERSACLEAN | 260 | 在LD-22-1-7井(204 ℃)、KS9井(170 ℃)、GL1井(260 ℃)中应用 | |
MEGADRIL | 260 | 配方简单,低ECD,南海西部应用 | |
白油基钻井液体系 | 300 | 以聚醚羧酸乳化剂和纳米流型调节剂为核心,用于大陆钻探 | |
哈里伯顿 | 柴油体系INVERMUL | 260 | 以脂肪酸衍生物乳化剂、塔罗油类降滤失剂为核心,抗盐水污染 |
白油体系ENVIROMUL | 260 | 抗污染能力,在库车山前应用 | |
全氟聚醚钻井液 | 315 | 含氟流体和处理剂热稳定性好 | |
贝克休斯 | CARBO-DRILL | 260 | 改性脂肪酸抗高温乳化剂为核心,全球范围内已应用20多年 |
MAGMA-TEQ | 260 | 适配多种基础油,抗温能力强 |
国外公司 | 钻井液体系 | 抗温/℃ | 应用特点及现场实例 |
---|---|---|---|
MI-SWACO | RHADIANT | 260 | 稳定的非渐进凝胶结构,抗污染能力强 |
VERSADRIL | 260 | 塔里木高温区块成功应用 | |
VERSACLEAN | 260 | 在LD-22-1-7井(204 ℃)、KS9井(170 ℃)、GL1井(260 ℃)中应用 | |
MEGADRIL | 260 | 配方简单,低ECD,南海西部应用 | |
白油基钻井液体系 | 300 | 以聚醚羧酸乳化剂和纳米流型调节剂为核心,用于大陆钻探 | |
哈里伯顿 | 柴油体系INVERMUL | 260 | 以脂肪酸衍生物乳化剂、塔罗油类降滤失剂为核心,抗盐水污染 |
白油体系ENVIROMUL | 260 | 抗污染能力,在库车山前应用 | |
全氟聚醚钻井液 | 315 | 含氟流体和处理剂热稳定性好 | |
贝克休斯 | CARBO-DRILL | 260 | 改性脂肪酸抗高温乳化剂为核心,全球范围内已应用20多年 |
MAGMA-TEQ | 260 | 适配多种基础油,抗温能力强 |
钻井液体系 | 井号 | 温度/ ℃ | 井深/ m | 密度/ (g·cm-3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
水基钻井液 | SK2井 | 241.0 | 7 018 | 1.48~1.50 |
MS1井 | 241.0 | 6 005 | 1.20 | |
JT1井 | 235.0 | 6 343 | 1.75~1.81 | |
SK1井 | 235.0 | 7 026 | 1.70~1.74 | |
YT1井 | 230.0 | 6 194 | 1.82~2.30 | |
YTX井 | 205.0 | 5 909 | 2.32~2.50 | |
DT1井 | 201.8 | 5 367 | 2.21 | |
CT1井 | 200.0 | 7 280 | 1.16~1.20 | |
油基钻井液 | TT1井 | 216.0 | 6 450 | 1.55 |
DS1井 | 197.0 | 6 328 | 1.27 | |
GS3井 | 200.0 | 4 920 | 1.15~1.30 | |
KS21井 | 186.0 | 8 089 | 2.58 |
钻井液体系 | 井号 | 温度/ ℃ | 井深/ m | 密度/ (g·cm-3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
水基钻井液 | SK2井 | 241.0 | 7 018 | 1.48~1.50 |
MS1井 | 241.0 | 6 005 | 1.20 | |
JT1井 | 235.0 | 6 343 | 1.75~1.81 | |
SK1井 | 235.0 | 7 026 | 1.70~1.74 | |
YT1井 | 230.0 | 6 194 | 1.82~2.30 | |
YTX井 | 205.0 | 5 909 | 2.32~2.50 | |
DT1井 | 201.8 | 5 367 | 2.21 | |
CT1井 | 200.0 | 7 280 | 1.16~1.20 | |
油基钻井液 | TT1井 | 216.0 | 6 450 | 1.55 |
DS1井 | 197.0 | 6 328 | 1.27 | |
GS3井 | 200.0 | 4 920 | 1.15~1.30 | |
KS21井 | 186.0 | 8 089 | 2.58 |
密度/ (g·cm-3) | AV/ (mPa·s) | PV/ (mPa·s) | YP/ Pa | 初(终)切/ Pa | ES/ V | FLHTHP/ mL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.80 | 58.0 | 47 | 11.0 | 2.0(4.0) | 915 | 4.8 |
2.40 | 86.5 | 71 | 15.5 | 2.5(5.5) | 846 | 3.2 |
2.60 | 126.0 | 107 | 19.0 | 3.5(7.0) | 1 037 | 4.4 |
体系配方 | 白油+4.0%CQ-HOP+3.0%CQ-HOS+5.0%CaO+3.0%CQ-HOC+1.5%CQ-HOF+3.0%沥青(260 ℃)+2.0%CQ-HOB+氯化钙盐水+重晶石 |
密度/ (g·cm-3) | AV/ (mPa·s) | PV/ (mPa·s) | YP/ Pa | 初(终)切/ Pa | ES/ V | FLHTHP/ mL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.80 | 58.0 | 47 | 11.0 | 2.0(4.0) | 915 | 4.8 |
2.40 | 86.5 | 71 | 15.5 | 2.5(5.5) | 846 | 3.2 |
2.60 | 126.0 | 107 | 19.0 | 3.5(7.0) | 1 037 | 4.4 |
体系配方 | 白油+4.0%CQ-HOP+3.0%CQ-HOS+5.0%CaO+3.0%CQ-HOC+1.5%CQ-HOF+3.0%沥青(260 ℃)+2.0%CQ-HOB+氯化钙盐水+重晶石 |
[1] | 何立成, 唐波. 准噶尔盆地超深井钻井技术现状与发展建议[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2022, 50(5):1-8. |
HE Licheng, TANG Bo. The up to date technologies of ultra-deep well drilling in Junggar basin and suggestions for further improvements[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(5):1-8. | |
[2] | 徐春春, 邹伟宏, 杨跃明, 等. 中国陆上深层油气资源勘探开发现状及展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8):1139-1153. |
XU Chunchun, ZOU Weihong, YANG Yueming, et al. Status and prospects of exploration and exploitation of the deep oil & gas resources onshore China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(8):1139-1153. | |
[3] | 胥志雄, 张辉, 尹国庆, 等. 超深井安全提速提产地质工程一体化关键技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(11):104-114. |
XU Zhixiong, ZHANG Hui, YIN Guoqing, et al. Key technologies of geology-engineering integration for safe ROP improvement and production increase of ultra-deep wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(11):104-114. | |
[4] | 苏义脑, 路保平, 刘岩生, 等. 中国陆上深井超深井钻完井技术现状及攻关建议[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(5):527-542. |
SU Yinao, LU Baoping, LIU Yansheng, et al. Status and research suggestions on the drilling and completion technologies for onshore deep and ultra deep wells in China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(5):527-542. | |
[5] | 杨博仲, 汪瑶, 叶小科. 川西地区复杂超深井钻井技术[J]. 钻采工艺, 2018, 41(4):27-30. |
YANG Bozhong, WANG Yao, YE Xiaoke. Drilling technology for complex and ultra-deep Wells in the Western Sichuan[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 41 (4):27-30. | |
[6] | 焦方正, 杨雨, 冉崎, 等. 四川盆地中部地区走滑断层的分布与天然气勘探[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8):92-101. |
JIAO Fangzheng, YANG Yu, RAN Qi, et al. Distribution and gas exploration of the strike-slip faults in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8):92-101. | |
[7] | 罗鸣, 冯永存, 桂云, 等. 高温高压钻井关键技术发展现状及展望[J]. 石油科学通报, 2021, 6(2):228-244. |
LUO Ming, FENG Yongcun, GUI Yun, et al. Development status and prospect of key technologies for high temperature and high pressure drilling[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2021, 6(2):228-244. | |
[8] | 汪海阁, 黄洪春, 毕文欣, 等. 深井超深井油气钻井技术进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8):163-177. |
WANG Haige, HUANG Hongchun, BI Wenxin, et al. Deep and ultra-deep oil/gas well drilling technologies:progress and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8):163-177. | |
[9] | 汪海阁, 葛云华, 石林. 深井超深井钻完井技术现状、挑战和“十三五”发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(4):1-8. |
WANG Haige, GE Yunhua, SHI Lin. Technologies in deep and ultra-deep well drilling:present status,challenges and future trend in the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020)[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(4):1-8. | |
[10] | 伍贤柱, 万夫磊, 陈作, 等. 四川盆地深层碳酸盐岩钻完井技术实践与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(2):97-105. |
WU Xianzhu, WAN Fulei, CHEN Zuo, et al. Drilling and completion technologies for deep carbonate rocks in the Sichuan Basin:Practices and prospects[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(2):97-105. | |
[11] | 赵征南, 受吉相, 王成凯. 我国首口万米深井诞生, 刷新亚洲纪录——塔里木油田深地塔科 1 井肩负科学探索和油气发现两大使命[N]. 文汇报,2024-3-5(6). |
ZHAO Zhengnan, SHOU Jixiang, WANG Chengkai. Refresh Asian record,China's landmark deep-Earth borehole drilling exceeds 10000 meters:the ″Shenditake 1″ borehole in the Tarim Basin shouldering the dual missions of scientific exploration and oil and gas discovery[N]. Wenhui Daily,2024-3-5(6). | |
[12] | 金晓辉, 孟庆强, 孙冬胜, 等. 万米钻探工程的石油地质理论依据与勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(5):973-981. |
JIN Xiaohui, MENG Qingqiang, SUN Dongsheng, et al. Basis of petroleum geological theory and exploration direction for ultra-deep exploration of 10 000-meter depth[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(5):973-981. | |
[13] | 王志刚, 王稳石, 张立烨, 等. 万米科学超深井钻完井现状与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(13):27-35. |
WANG Zhigang, WANG Wenshi, ZHANG Liye, et al. Present situation and prospect of drilling and completion of 10 000 meter scientific ultra deep wells[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(13):27-35. | |
[14] | 孙键. 超深井钻井技术进展研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2023, 35(7):71-73. |
SUN Jian. Research on the development of ultra-deep well drilling technology[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2023, 35(7):71-73. | |
[15] | 王明华, 贺立勤, 卓云, 等. 川渝地区9 000 m级超深超高温超高压地层安全钻井技术实践与认识[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2023, 46(2):44-50. |
WANG Minghua, HE Liqin, ZHUO Yun, et al. Practices and understandings on safe drilling technologies for 9 000-m-level super deep and ultra high temperature and pressure strata,Sichuan-Chongqing area[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2023, 46(2):44-50. | |
[16] | 赵德. 墨西哥湾深水盐下复杂地层钻井技术研究及应用[J]. 中国新技术新产品, 2022(2):133-135. |
ZHAO De. Research and application of drilling technology in deepwater pre-salt complex formation in Gulf of Mexico[J]. New Technology & New Products of China, 2022(2):133-135. | |
[17] | 刘宝军, 曹思阁, 陈友生. 川东盐下复杂超深井井身结构设计与实践——以楼探1井为例[C]//第31届全国天然气学术年会(2019)论文集,2019-10-30, 中国安徽合肥, 2019. |
LIU Baojun, CAO Sige, CHEN Yousheng. Well structure design and practice of complex ultra-deep well under salt in East Sichuan: Taking Loutan 1 as an example[C]// The 31st National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference,2019-10-30, Hefei,Anhui,China, 2019. | |
[18] |
万夫磊, 刘素君, 刘宝军. 大兴场构造复杂深井井身结构设计[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(6):124-127.
DOI |
WAN Fulei, LIU Baojun, LIU Baojun,. Unconventional casing programs for complex-deep wells of Daxingchang[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(6):124-127. | |
[19] | 刘素君, 唐克松, 雷俨卜. 应对复杂推覆体七开非常规井身结构开发与应用—以红星1井为例[C]//第31届全国天然气学术年会(2019)论文集,2019-10-31, 中国合肥, 2019. |
LIU Sujun, TTANG Kesheng, LEI Yanbo. Development and application of seven-open unconventional shaft structure for complex thrust cover: Take Hongxing 1 well as an example[C]// Proceedings of the 31st National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference( 2019),2019-10-31, Hefei China, 2019. | |
[20] | 胡大梁, 欧彪, 张道平, 等. 川深1超深井钻井优化设计[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(2):34-37. |
HU Daliang, OU Biao, ZHANG Daoping, et al. Drilling optimization design of ultradeep well CS1 in Sichuan Basin[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(2):34-37. | |
[21] | 颜辉, 李宁, 阳君奇, 等. 砾石层异型齿 PDC 钻头的设计及现场试验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(3):9-15. |
YAN Hui, LI Ning, YANG Junqi, et al. Design and field test of special-shaped cutter PDC bit in gravel layer[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(3):9-15. | |
[22] | 杨阳, 李万军, 周拓, 等. 国内外深井超深井对海外复杂地区优快钻井的启示[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(12):123-124. |
YANG Yang, LI Wanjun, ZHOU Tuo, et al. The enlightenment of deep and ultra-deep wells at home and abroad to optimal and rapid drilling in complex areas overseas[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2019, 39(12):123-124. | |
[23] |
周代生, 杨欢, 胡锡辉, 等. 川西双鱼石构造超深井大尺寸井眼钻井提速技术研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019, 42(6):25-27.
DOI |
ZHOU Daisheng, YANG Huan, HU Xihui, et al. Study on ROP improvement technology for large-size ultradeep wells at Shuangyushi structure in western Sichuan[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 42(6):25-27. | |
[24] | 王军, 范翔宇. 四川盆地九龙山地区超深井优快钻井配套技术[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(1):28-35. |
WANG Jun, FAN Xiangyu. Supporting schemes to optimize fast drilling of ultra-deep wells,Jiulongshan area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(1):28-35. | |
[25] |
苏强, 何世明, 胡锡辉, 等. 川西双鱼石构造难钻地层岩石可钻性及钻头选型研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019, 42(2):124-127.
DOI |
SU Qiang, HE Shiming, HU Xihui, et al. Research and application on rock drillability and bit selection of difficult drilling formations in Shuangyushi structure of Western Sichuan Basin[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 42(2):124-127. | |
[26] | 刘锋报, 孙金声, 王建华. 国内外深井超深井钻井液技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2023, 19(2):34-39. |
LIU Fengbao, SUN Jinsheng, WANG Jianhua. A global review of technical status and development trend of drilling fluids for deep and ultra-deep wells[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2023, 19(2):34-39. | |
[27] | 刘涛, 于建立, 谢和平, 等. 海上环保型抗高温防塌钻井液体系研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(5):173-177. |
LIU Tao, ZHANG Jie, YU Jianli, et al. Research and application of offshore environment-friendly high-temperature and anti-collapse drilling fluid system[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(5):173-177. | |
[28] | 刘虎, 罗平亚, 陈思安, 等. 元坝区块超高温高密度饱和盐水钻井液体系优化与现场试验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(5):124-132. |
LIU Hu, LUO Pingya, CHEN Sian, et al. Optimization and field test of ultra-high temperature high destiny saturated brine drilling fluid system in Yuanba area,Sichuan[J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2023, 46(5):124-132. | |
[29] | 邱正松, 赵冲, 张现斌, 等. 超高温高密度油基钻井液研究与性能评价[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2021, 38(06):663-670. |
QIU Zhengsong, ZHAO Chong, ZHANG Xianbin, et al. Study and performance evaluation of ultra-high temperature high density oil based drilling fluids[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2021, 38(6):663-670. | |
[30] | 王星媛, 陆灯云, 吴正良. 抗220℃高密度油基钻井液的研究与应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(5):550-554. |
WANG Xingyuan, LU Dengyun, WU Zhengliang. Study and application of a high density oil base drilling fluid with high temperature resistance of 220 ℃[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(5):550-554. | |
[31] |
康毅力, 王凯成, 许成元, 等. 深井超深井钻井堵漏材料高温老化性能评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2):215-223.
DOI |
KANG Yili, WANG Kaicheng, XU Chengyuan, et al. High-temperature aging property evaluation of lost circulation materials in deep and ultra-deep well drilling[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(2):215-223.
DOI |
|
[32] | 许洁, 乌效鸣, 王稳石, 等. 松科2井抗超高温钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液. 2018, 35(2):29-34. |
XU Jie, WU Xiaoming, WANG Wenshi, et al. Ultra-high temperature drilling fluid technology of well Songke-2[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(2):29-34. | |
[33] | 尹士轩, 徐宝昌, 孟卓然, 等. 控压钻井的控制理论研究与装备研发进展[J]. 化工自动化及仪表, 2023, 50(5):622-631. |
YIN Shixuan, XU Baochang, MENG Zhuoran, et al. Control theory research and progress in the equipment development of managed pressure drilling[J]. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2023, 50(5):622-631. | |
[34] | 孙翊成, 蒋林, 刘成钢, 等. 精细控压固井技术在川渝及塔里木盆地的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45 (3):15-19. |
SUN Yicheng, JIANG Lin, LIU Chenggang, et al. Precise managed pressure cementing technology application in Sichuan,Chongqing and Tarim Basin[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(3):15-20. | |
[35] |
秦富兵, 朱仁发, 黄亚楼. GS001-X井灯影组溢漏同存情况下精细控压钻井技术探讨[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(6):121-123.
DOI |
QIN Fubing, ZHU Renfa, HUANG Yalou. Discussion on safe drilling technology in well GS-X with overflow and leakage in Dengying formation[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(6):121-123. | |
[36] | 左星, 万昕, 苏立飞. 精细控压钻井技术在四川盆地安岳气田震旦系灯影组气藏开发中的应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2017, 40(4):105-109. |
ZUO Xing, WAN Xin, SU Lifei. Application of precise managed pressure drilling technology in Sinian Dengying Formation in Anyue Gas Field,the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017, 40(4):105-109. | |
[37] |
万夫磊, 曹晓丽, 张尧, 等. 川中蓬莱气区复杂超深井钻井技术研究与实践[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(6):34-40.
DOI |
WAN Fulei, CAO Xiaoli, ZHANG Yao, et al. Research and practice of complex ultra-deep well drilling technology in PL[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(6):34-40. | |
[38] |
孙金声, 白英睿, 程荣超, 等. 裂缝性恶性井漏地层堵漏技术研究进展与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3):630-638.
DOI |
SUN Jinsheng, BAI Yingrui, CHENG Rongchao, et al. Research progress and prospect of plugging technologies for fractured formation with severe lost circulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3):630-638. | |
[39] | 刘静, 马诚, 杨超, 等. 井漏地层钻井液堵漏材料研究现状与展望[J]. 油田化学, 2023, 40(4):729-735. |
LIU Jing, MA Cheng, YANG Chao, et al. Current status and prospects of drilling fluid plugging materials for lost circulation formations[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2023, 40(4):729-735. | |
[40] | 赵洪波, 单文军, 朱迪斯, 等. 裂缝性地层漏失机理及堵漏材料新进展[J]. 油田化学, 2021, 38(4):740-746. |
ZHAO Hongbo, SHAN Wenjun, ZHU Disi, et al. Advance of fractured formation lost circulation mechanism and lost circulation materials in oil and gas wells[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2021, 38(4):740-746. | |
[41] | 齐奉忠, 冯宇思, 韩琴. 国内外固井技术发展历程与研究方向[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2018, 37(5):35-39. |
QI Fengzhong, FENG Yusi, HAN Qin. Development process and research orientation of Chinese and foreign cementing technology[J]. Oil Forum, 2018, 37(5):35-39. | |
[42] | 吉野, 孙凯, 唐一元, 等. 国内外深井超深井固井技术研究现状[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2008, 10(6):27-30. |
JI Ye, SUN Kai, TANG Yiyuan, et al. Study on the present domestic and foreign research situation of deep well and extra-deep well cementation engineering[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), 2008, 10(6):27-30. | |
[43] | 陈敏, 赵常青, 林强, 等. 川渝地区窄安全密度窗口天然气深井固井新技术[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(3):62-67. |
CHEN Min, ZHAO Changqing, LIN Qiang, et al. New cementing technique for deep gas wells with narrow safe density window in Sichuan and Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(3):62-67. | |
[44] | 宋有胜, 邹建龙, 赵宝辉, 等. 高石梯-磨溪区块高压气井尾管固井技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2017, 34(2):111-116. |
SONG Yousheng, ZOU Jianlong, ZHAO Baohui, et al. Liner cementing the high pressure gas wells in the block Gaoshiti-Moxi[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(2):111-116. | |
[45] | 沈欣宇, 胡锡辉, 杨博仲, 等. 近平衡压力固井技术在超深易漏失井的应用 ——以五探1井Ø168.3 mm尾管固井为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(1):35-39. |
SHEN Xinyu, HU Xihui, YANG Bozhong, et al. Application of the near equilibrium pressure cementing technique in ultra deep leakage wells:a case study on the Ø168.3 mm liner cementing of Well Wutan 1[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(1):35-39. | |
[46] | 马香, 江艳, 李亚辉, 等. 挑战深地极限——全球首台12 000米特深井自动化钻机诞生记[J]. 国企管理, 2023(7):97-100. |
MA Xiang, JIANG Yan, LI Yahui, et al. Challenge the limits of deep earth-the birth of the world's first 12,000 meter deep drilling automation rig[J]. China State-Owned Enterprise Management, 2023(7):97-100. | |
[47] | 王定亚, 孙娟, 张茄新, 等. 陆地石油钻井装备技术现状及发展方向探讨[J]. 石油机械, 2021, 49(1):47-52. |
WANG Dingya, SUN Juan, ZHANG Jiaxin, et al. Discussion on technical status and development direction of land oil-field drilling equipment[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2021, 49(1):47-52. |
[1] | HE Xiao. Key Technologies and Development Directions of Ultra-deep Well Drilling in Western Sichuan [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2024, 47(2): 19-27. |
[2] | MENG Yingfeng. Gas Drilling Technology for Achieving Efficient Development of Tight Gas [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2024, 47(1): 1-15. |
[3] | WAN Fulei, CAO Xiaoli, ZHANG Yao, TAO Sicai, FAN Shenglin. Research and Practice of Complex Ultra-deep Well Drilling Technology in PL [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(6): 34-40. |
[4] | YANG Ruifan. Innovation and Practice of Drilling Technology for Deep Shale Gas Wells in Sichuan [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(4): 13-19. |
[5] | LIU Deping, DAI Rui, PENG Cong, SUN Zheng, YANG Can, LIN Kang, CAI Gang. Research and Application of Safe Slimhole Drilling Technology for Deep Well with Ultra-large Annulus: A Case Study From Plenglai Gas Filed of Sichuan Basin [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(2): 15-20. |
[6] | FU Qiang. Drilling Practice and Understanding of Ultra-long Horizontal Section Wells of Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(4): 9-18. |
[7] | HUANG Zhiqiang, CHEN Xun, SHI Lianhai, TONG Xin, LIU Mingtao, TONG Deshui, WANG Yan. Research Development and Analysis of Micro-hole Radial Drilling Technology [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(3): 27-30. |
[8] | GUO Qing, BAO Lijun, SUN Haifang. Prospect and Development of Drilling Technology in China for 30 Years [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(2): 1-6. |
[9] |
HU Daliang, OU Biao, ZHANG Daoping, XIAO Guoyi, YAN Yancheng, YI Shiyou.
Drilling Optimization Design of Ultra-deep Well CS |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||